Adesina, who is a former Nigerian minister of agriculture, is scheduled to have a re-election for a second term of 5 years at the helm of Africa’s largest multilateral lender and development finance institution.
The AfDB’s mission has been to fight poverty and improve living conditions on the continent through promoting the investment of public and private capital in projects and programs that are likely to contribute to the economic and social development of the region.
While all African member countries of the bank based in Cote d’Ivoire have already cast their votes of confidence and support for the second term in office of the agricultural economist, he has however been trying to weather the revoking storm of antagonism from the United States.
The United States is a non-African member of the bank with the second shareholding after Nigeria. The top 10 shareholders of the AfDB are Nigeria (8.20%), USA (6.60%), Egypt (5.60%), Japan (5.50%), South Africa (5.10%), Algeria (4.20%), Germany (4.20%), Canada (3.90%), France (3.80%) and Côte d’Ivoire (3.80%). Hence, the voting power ratio on the bank’s Board is split with respect to the size of each member’s share, which is currently at 60%-40% between African and non-African member countries.
It is apparent that the administration of United States President Donald Trump is against the retention of Adesina as the AfDB President for the second term, and it is seeking to shatter his ambition by all means.
America is accusing Adesina of malpractices (favoritism and nepotism) in the disposition of his leadership office at the bank.
In the same light, some officials of the bank had accused Adesina for lack of respect of internal rules and regulations in recruitment, with the huge allegation that AfDB has hired many Nigerians into the bank’s top management.
Adesina has refuted the accusations claims, terming them “spurious and unfounded allegations”.
The brain behind all accusations dished out at Adesina is Stephen Dowd, the Bank executive director serving as the American representative.
It would be recalled that the AfDB’s Ethics Committee, which is composed of executive directors representing shareholder nations, has met and deliberated severally on each and every allegations over a three-month span, and has exonerated Adesina from all charges leveled against him.
Going by the analysts, the United States is trying to look for Adesina’s Achilles’ heel which they can leverage upon to usurp him as the AfDB’s president, and declare him unfit and ineligible for a re-election in August 2020. But, the effort has been in futility with the findings and verdict of the probe panel.
However, the United States is resilient in its opposition to Adesina’s re-election as the Trump administration has asked for an external body to probe the allegations anew.
In a recent letter dated May 22nd, and addressed to Niale Kaba, chairwoman of the bank’s board of governors, the United States Treasury Secretary, Steven Mnuchin, has rejected the plans of the African bank’s board to close Adesina’s investigation, and called for an independent probe into the allegations against him. However, there’s no provision for that in the bank’s governance rules.
This sprawling development of eyebrows from the United States has tickled the curiosity of many people who wants to know the rationale behind the Americans’ opposition to Adesina’s continued leadership at the AfDB.
Some facts have now emerged that makes the motive behind the Americans’ attitude towards Adesina to be crystal clear.
In February, the President of the World Bank, David Malpass, heavily criticized the AfDB and similar regional development banks, such as the Asian Development Bank, for excessive lending, accusing them of contributing to emerging nations’ debt problems.
Speaking at a World Bank IMF debt forum in Washington on February 10, Malpass, who is an American, said the AfDB was “pushing large amounts of money into Nigeria, South Africa, and others without the strongest program to sustain it and push it forward.”
The AfDB dismissed Malpass’ accusation as “inaccurate and not fact based, describing the criticism as an assault to the integrity of the African Development Bank, undermines our governance systems, and incorrectly insinuates that we operate under different standards from the World Bank.”
The AfDB added that it relies on the IMF and World Bank debt sustainability analyses in designing its lending to African countries.
It has now been revealed that Dowdy, a personal friend of the World Bank chief, has also been internally criticising the lending policy of the AfDB.
Some analysts say the problem the US has with Dr Adesina is that he’s been employing the principles of development economics to operate the AfDB, and not according to the classic Bretton Woods practices of the World Bank and IMF.
In his keynote speech during the 8thAfrican Leadership Persons of the Year in February 2020 in Johannesburg, Dr Adesina, explaining his work at the AfDB, said: “I focus on solutions, not problems. My principle for development is also simple: I simply list down the things I feel most ashamed of, and then I do the opposite. It’s how I came up with my idea for the African Development Bank’s High 5 Strategy to light up and power Africa, to feed Africa, to industrialize Africa, to integrate Africa, and to improve the quality of life of the people of Africa. Five simple, strategic, and highly focused objectives.”
Under the leadership of Adesina, AfDB’s lending has been driven by this “High 5 Strategy”, especially focusing on agriculture, energy and road infrastructure.
The African bank since Adesina assumed its leadership on 1 September 2015 has financed major infrastructure projects across the continent. These include the Ethiopia-Djibouti Power Interconnection Project and the Ethiopia-Kenya Transmission Highway Project, which is East Africa’s first high voltage direct current power line and expected to boost the exchange of electricity between the two countries.
The AfDB has also went on to support the first inter-regional 400 KV power inter-connector between Zambia, Tanzania and Kenya linking East African Community and Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries.
Other notable energy infrastructure projects financed by the AfDB include the Kariba North and Ithezi-Thezi Power Hydro Generation Projects in Zambia-Zimbabwe, which provided power to the SADC region through the Southern Africa Power Pool.
The story is not different in other regions of the continent.
In the area of transport infrastructure, the AfDB has also supported the construction and improvements of multinational road corridors to facilitate a safer and efficient movement of people and goods across borders and landlocked countries to seaports, therefore facilitating regional integration and Intra- African trade as well as with global markets.
Dr Akinwumi Adesina focuses on infrastructure and energy as he correctly understands that a main challenge to Africa development is that Western-controlled international lenders deliberately do not help fundamentally tackle the underperformance of African economies.
This is why despite hundreds of billions of loans and aid granted to the continent since independence, African economies have not developed strong capacity for sustainable growth and development.
Adesina is not a board room banker but an agricultural economist who has been actively and practically involved in development issues in Africa for more than three decades. He was Nigeria’s Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development from 2010-2015, where he made tremendous impact.
Before his ministerial tenure in Nigeria, he was Vice President of Policy and Partnerships for the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa. He had also served as a senior economist at the West African Rice Development Association in Bouaké, Cote d’Ivoire, before which he had worked at the Rockefeller Foundation as an associate director for food security.
Dr Adesina’s records at the AfDB have been remarkable. Under his leadership, the bank has maintained its AAA rating by all the four major global rating agencies, consecutively for four years, a reflection of the AfDB’s sound financial and risk management, excellent liquidity and strong shareholder support, experts say.
In 2018, Adesina aided the creation of the AfDB-sponsored Africa Investment Forum which in 2018 and 2019 attracted more than $80 billion in infrastructure investment interests into the continent. The United States was against the creation of the Forum as it did not deem it necessary and ostensibly outside the remit of the bank.
In 2019, Adesina successfully led the AfDB’s shareholder capital increase from $93 billion to $208 billion, again, in spite of strong US opposition.
The Americans have also not been happy with Adesina for not being critical of China’s investment activities in Africa. “Do not be overly concerned about China’s presence in Africa economically. Be more concerned about America’s absence,” he’s quoted to have once told a US audience.
Political economists say the logger head between the United States and Adesina is mainly a duel for supremacy over development financing in Africa. The Americans fear the growth of AfDB’s capital base and its lending focus endanger the control they have always enjoyed through the World Bank on the continent.
Adesina has been globally honoured and recognized for his work. In 2010, United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon appointed him as one of 17 global leaders to spearhead the Millennium Development Goals and in 2017, he was awarded the World Food Prize, generally known as the “Nobel Prize for Agriculture”. Dr Adesina used the entire $250,000 Laureate award prize to establish a fund to support youth in agriculture.
The United States through its antagonism to Adesina’s re-election has exposed its lack of interest in the real economic development of Africa by insisting on a system of development financing that has failed the continent and its populace for more than sixty years.
The election for the president of the AfDB will take place in August. Analysts say Africa should not allow itself to be manipulated against its own interest. Not even the United States blind threat to pull out of the bank should dissuade Africans from stay glue to an initiative that can help the black continent to be completely independent foreign assistance.
